刘畅,胡卫卫.跨域生态治理“碎片化”的限度审视与整体性治理机制研究[J].中国环境管理,2024,16(1):154-161.
LIU Chang,HU Weiwei.Research on the Limits of “Fragmentation” and Holistic Governance Mechanism of Cross-Domain Ecological Governance[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Management,2024,16(1):154-161. |
| 跨域生态治理“碎片化”的限度审视与整体性治理机制研究 |
| Research on the Limits of “Fragmentation” and Holistic Governance Mechanism of Cross-Domain Ecological Governance |
| DOI：10.16868/j.cnki.1674-6252.2024.01.154 |
| 中文关键词: 碎片化 数字化时代 跨域生态治理 整体性治理 |
| 英文关键词:fragmentation digital age cross-domain ecological governance holistic governance |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目“建设共建共治共享的社会治理制度研究”（22ZDA101）；陕西省自然科学基金青年项目“陕西省黄河流域生态空间整体性治理绩效评价与影响机理研究”（2022JQ-729）；四川省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“数字赋能背景下乡村复杂性风险的韧性治理机制研究”(SQZL2023A01)。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 277 |
| 全文下载次数: 349 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 突破行政区划，构建跨域生态治理的有效实践机制是推进生态文明、建设美丽中国的迫切需要。数字技术建构了全新的治理场域，也形塑着新的治理模式。本文将跨域生态治理置于数字化时代的宏大视野，研究认为：传统跨域生态治理模式面临难以突破的“碎片化”瓶颈，主要表现为治理目标碎片化、治理资源碎片化和治理主体碎片化，究其原因在于利益失衡下的府际不合，“技”“智”缺位下的整合失力和能力动力双匮下的参与缺失。基于此，在系统解构整体性治理理论内涵的基础上，数字化时代跨域生态治理与整体性治理在价值、工具和场域方面存在高度耦合。最后，提出通过科学补偿和考核优化建立利益共享机制，通过资源整合与整体智治建立科学施策机制、信息共享与诉求回应建立多元协同机制，形塑整体性治理的协调、整合、信任机制，以期推进“碎片化”问题的弥合解决和跨域生态治理现代化的实现。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Breaking through administrative divisions and constructing an effective practice mechanism for cross-domain ecological governance is an urgent need to promote ecological civilization and build a beautiful China. Digital technology has constructed a brand-new governance field and shaped a new governance mode. This paper puts cross-domain ecological governance in the grand perspective of the digital era. The study concludes that the traditional cross-domain ecological governance model faces the bottleneck of “fragmentation” that is difficult to break through, mainly manifested in the fragmentation of the governance objectives, governance resources, and governance subjects, which is attributed to the intergovernmental incompatibility under the imbalance of interests, the integration failure under the absence of “technology” and “wisdom”, and the participation deficiency under the scarcity of the ability and power. Based on this, the systematic deconstruction of the theoretical connotation of holistic governance suggests that there is a high degree of coupling between cross-domain ecological governance and holistic governance in terms of values, tools and fields in the digital era. On this basis, it is proposed to establish a benefit-sharing mechanism through scientific compensation and appraisal optimization, a scientific policy-making mechanism through resource integration and overall wise governance, a multi-dimensional synergistic mechanism through information sharing and response to demands, and a mechanism of coordination, integration and trust in holistic governance, with a view to promote the solution of “fragmentation” and the realization of cross-domain ecological governance modernization. |
| HTML 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
